Vox

Rep. Jasmine Crockett wants you to know she comes by her controversies and clap-backs honestly. The representative from Texas has served just two terms in Congress, but is already a rising political star and a bona fide internet sensation. She’s also become a political lightning rod for Democrats as well as Republicans. Crockett has built her brand on coining phrases that are almost President Donald Trump-like in their virality. She goes after the president and the administration relentlessly, and says it's the only way to stay relevant and gain voters’ trust in the Trump era.
But if Democrats are less than thrilled with her performance, that’s due more to style than substance, at least, according to her. This week on Today, Explained, Vox’s Astead Herndon travels to Washington, DC, to meet with Crockett and finds her unwilling to back down from her most controversial statements, including comments about some Latino voters having a “slave mentality” and that she doesn’t need Trump voters to win.
Regret and apology are not Crockett’s brand, which has many Democrats worrying about her candidacy for a Senate seat in Texas. In this interview, she walks through her plan and formula for winning that Senate seat: running up the numbers among Black voters, the most loyal voting block for Democrats in Texas, and encouraging nonvoters to participate in the primary.
00:17 Intro
01:25 Who is a Jasmine Crockett voter?
01:59 The ‘bleach blonde’ moment: planned or not?
03:20 Are clapbacks the new Democratic strategy?
05:28 From public defender to Congress
07:38 Strategy for Democrats to win
11:41 Race and racism in US politics
14:12 Viral anti-Rep. Crockett moments in culture
17:52 Policy pushbacks against Rep. Crockett
Today, Explained is a daily news podcast from Vox that explains one story in the news or culture each day while doing its best not to bum you out. Every Saturday, we’ll be in your audio feeds, and here on YouTube, with interesting interviews with key figures in politics and culture. You can also get new episodes of Today, Explained every weekday on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite listening app.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/Vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
For more than a century, the size of the House of Representatives has been frozen at 435 seats; in that same period, the US population has tripled. This means that today, the average representative is responsible for more than 750,000 constituents. Scholars and politicians say this imbalance is why many Americans feel like Congress is disconnected from them.
So what if we…added more seats? That’s what Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) is proposing in a new bill because he believes it’s closer to what the country’s founders originally envisioned. While expanding Congress could make our ratio of voters to representatives smaller, it also raises a difficult question: Can a larger, more crowded legislature actually govern, or are we just adding more voices to the gridlock? Vox dives into the math, the history, and the potential future of a "bigger" American democracy.
Read more about expanding the House of Representatives:
The Case for Enlarging the House of Representatives, a report from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, co-authored by Lee Drutman, who’s featured in the video.
https://www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose/enlarging-the-house
Protect Democracy:
https://protectdemocracy.org/work/expanding-the-house-of-representatives-explained/
The text of Rep. Sean Casten’s bill:
https://casten.house.gov/imo/media/doc/equal_voices_act_119th.pdf
The Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929:
https://www.census.gov/topics/public-sector/congressional-apportionment/about/historical-perspective.html
US population keeps growing, but House of Representatives is same size as in Taft era:
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/05/31/u-s-population-keeps-growing-but-house-of-representatives-is-same-size-as-in-taft-era/
This story was supported by a grant from Protect Democracy. Vox had full discretion over the content of this reporting.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: https://www.youtube.com/voxdotcom/videos
Follow Vox on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Vox
Or Twitter: https://x.com/voxdotcom
Trump’s approval rating is one of the lowest in recorded history. And it’s fallen to new lows in recent weeks, as the nation reels from the recent killings of two anti-ICE protesters in Minnesota. Yet, the Trump White House shows no signs of backing off its agenda or moderating to reflect public opinion.
This week, Today, Explained is taking a pulse check on MAGA. We’ve looked at focus groups, talked to pollsters, and checked in with some of the voters from the 2024 presidential campaign trail. In this episode we ask whether MAGA is still defending the president. Host Astead Herndon brings that question to two people who follow Trump’s base closely: John Fredericks, the host of the right-wing radio show The John Fredericks Show, and Sarah Longwell, the founder and publisher of the conservative-leaning publication The Bulwark.
Today, Explained is a daily news podcast from Vox that explains one story in the news or culture each day while doing its best not to bum you out. Every Saturday, we’ll be in your audio feeds and right here on YouTube with more interesting interviews with key figures in politics and culture. You can also get new episodes of Today, Explained every weekday on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite listening app.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/Vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Thanks to The Bulwark’s Focus Group podcast for use of their swing voter footage.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
How Finland defeated fascism - January 30, 2026 - Vox
In the 1930s, a radical conservative faction almost pushed Finland into full authoritarianism. Called the Lapua movement, it was a far-right group of Finns who sought to overthrow the republic, marginalize communists, and install an authoritarian government. They managed to disrupt Finland’s political order through threats of violence and symbolic kidnappings, in which they would capture political rivals and drive them to the Soviet border.
They earned the support of center-right and moderate politicians who believed they could harness the passion and support of this radical nationalist group. The movement also included prominent businessmen, newspaper owners, and key members of the military.
But then… something happened. Almost overnight, the Lapua movement collapsed. Within three years of its founding, this far-right faction was banned from Finnish politics, and democracy in Finland has been stable ever since.
Vox producer Nate Krieger investigated the rise and fall of the Lapua movement to find out exactly how Finland managed to stave off this anti-democratic threat — and what modern democracies can learn from this perilous moment in history. By tracing how Finland successfully reversed course, we explore what actually works to halt fascist movements and restore democracy: early and collective action.
Sources and further reading:
Part of the inspiration for this video was the article “Democracy’s ‘Near Misses,’” written by Tom Ginsburg and Aziz Huq, the latter of whom was interviewed for this story. The full article can be found here https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/democracys-near-misses/
For a comprehensive history of Finland, see Jason Lavery’s aptly titled The History of Finland. More information about this text can be found on his website https://history-of-finland.com/
The National Library of Finland maintains a fantastic archive of Finnish historical images, and can be found here finna.fi
This story was supported by a grant from Protect Democracy. Vox had full discretion over the content of this reporting.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H