Vox

Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego is considering running for president in 2028. In a lot of ways, it makes sense: He’s an army veteran who represents a critical swing state with a sizable Latino electorate.
But could his previously close relationship with former Congress member Eric Swalwell complicate his political future?
This week on America, Actually, Gallego addresses his recent public apology regarding his ties to Swalwell following the Congress member’s sexual misconduct allegations. He also outlines his plans for bringing Latino voters back to the Democratic Party, and makes a case for why Democrats need to improve their outreach to men, including white men, in order to win elections.
00:00 Intro: Sen. Ruben Gallego
01:08 The GOP’s polling problem with Latino voters
04:06 What is the Democrats’ position on the border?
07:49 Fallout from the Laken Riley Act
09:07 The backlash to data centers in Arizona
12:29 Addressing the Swalwell allegations
15:40 On masculinity and authenticity
19:50 How Democrats can win back male voters
22:59 Gallego on a possible 2028 run
America, Actually publishes video episodes every Saturday, tackling key issues in politics, culture, and the economy. Subscribe to Vox’s YouTube channel to get them. Listen to episodes of America, Actually on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite app.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
On April 15, a federal jury found Live Nation Entertainment and Ticketmaster operated as an illegal monopoly, overcharging fans and shutting out competition.
After years of complaints, lawsuits, and the fallout from the 2022 Taylor Swift Eras Tour ticket sale controversy, the states took the case to trial, and won.
So now the question is simple: Will ticket prices actually go down? The answer, it turns out, is more complicated than limiting fees and creating more competition.
Read more about the Ticketmaster/Live Nation case:
Live Nation lost in court. Here’s what it means for concerts.
https://www.vox.com/today-explained-newsletter/485946/live-nation-monopoly-verdict-tickets
Is the Ticketmaster Monopoly Verdict a Mirage – https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-lede/is-the-ticketmaster-monopoly-verdict-a-mirage
Ticketmaster’s Big Loss in Court - https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/23/podcasts/the-daily/ticketmaster-live-nation-trial.html
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
The Supreme Court is aggressive on almost everything. Except the internet.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Sean talks with Vox’s Ian Millhiser about a surprising pattern at the Court. While it’s been eager to reshape schools, healthcare, and civil rights law, it has consistently taken a cautious, almost hands-off approach to regulating the internet. They unpack a recent case involving music piracy, the broader legal fight over who’s responsible for what happens online, and why even a highly ideological Court seems wary of breaking the digital world.
Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling)
Guest: Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser)
00:00 Intro
1:35 Not the nine greatest experts on the internet
4:46 Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment
14:59 Why is the court cautious about the internet?
22:48 The court and First Amendment issues
30:49 When technology moves too fast for the law
We would love to hear from you. To tell us what you thought of this episode, email us at [email protected] or leave us a voicemail at 1-800-214-5749. Your comments and questions help us make a better show.
And you can watch new episodes of The Gray Area on YouTube. New episodes drop every Monday and Friday.
Listen to The Gray Area ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members.
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
America's fishing paradox - April 22, 2026 - Vox
Every year, federal and state wildlife agencies in the US breed millions of fish and release them into the wild, all for fishers to catch. They do this because many ecosystems no longer support the thriving fish populations they once did, due to dams, pollution, and rising water temperatures.
But there’s a catch. In many cases, the fish that are being released aren’t native to these ecosystems. In Connecticut, where this video was filmed, the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) breeds and releases rainbow trout — from the West Coast — and brown trout, from Europe, Asia, and Northern Africa. Of course, states aren’t just throwing fish into the water at random. There are many preventative measures and monitoring systems in place to protect local ecosystems from the dangers of non-native species. But things can still go wrong.
Introducing non-native fish can wreak havoc on an ecosystem. So why are state wildlife agencies doing it by the million?
To see some fish stocking in action and learn more about the process, Vox producer Nate Krieger went on a fish stocking run with employees of Connecticut DEEP. In just under an hour, they released 675 live trout into the Mianus River for the recreation of local fishermen.
This video examines the strange paradox that incentivizes states to do something that, at least in some cases, hurts the very ecosystem they're trying to conserve. It explores the complicated question of fish stocking in the US, examines the possible dangers to ecosystems, and shines a light on potential conservation benefits. Because recreational fishing encourages people to spend time outside, which builds a relationship with nature and the environment that could be invaluable for our future.
Read more about non-native fish stocking:
Benji Jones’ article on non-native fish stocking: https://www.vox.com/climate/483175/fish-stocking-trout-wildlife-agencies
Connecticut DEEP’s report on fish stocking for 2026: portal.ct.gov/-/media/DEEP/fishing/weekly_reports/CurrentStockingReport.pdf
Apportionments data for hunting and fishing, broken down by category and state: partnerwithapayer.org/funding-sources/
“Wilderness Fish Stocking: History and Perspective” by Edwin P. Pister: www.jstor.org/stable/3658925?mag=fish-stocking-the-dark-underbelly-of-resource-management
Information and great photos on “fish cars,” the train cars full of live fish that powered fish stocking in the 1800s: pullman-museum.org/pshs/pshsCompoundObjectWebPage.php?collection=pshs&pointer=18283&root=18286
This video is part of a series supported by Animal Charity Evaluators, which received a grant from EarthShare.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
The Pentagon has spent years building AI tools to help identify targets, speed up battlefield decisions, and make war more “efficient.” What started as an effort to analyze drone footage has grown into something bigger and much more unsettling.
Subscribe to our channel and turn on notifications (🔔) so you don't miss any videos: http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Sean talks with Bloomberg’s Katrina Manson about Project Maven, the Defense Department’s long-running push to bring AI into warfighting. They discuss how these systems actually work, what “human in the loop” really means, why autonomy is no longer some far-off sci-fi scenario, and what happens when the speed and scale of machine decision-making collide with the fog of war.
Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling)
Guest: Katrina Manson (@KatrinaManson)
Chapter Titles
0:00 Intro
00:48 What is Project Maven?
8:00 Is there a human in the loop?
17:26 The chain of decision-making
22:26 Is full autonomy the future?
26:24 The conflict in Iran
31:16 The disagreement between Anthropic and the DOD
35:52 The morality of AI warfare
41:57 Will AI tech migrate from the battlefield to police forces?
We would love to hear from you. To tell us what you thought of this episode, email us at [email protected] or leave us a voicemail at 1-800-214-5749. Your comments and questions help us make a better show.
And you can watch new episodes of The Gray Area on YouTube. New episodes drop every Monday and Friday.
Listen to The Gray Area ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members.
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@voxdotcom
Check out our articles: https://www.vox.com/
Listen to our podcasts: https://www.vox.com/podcasts