Vox

Ambassador John Bolton, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, pushed for war with Iran for 20 years — but not like this. For years, even decades, John Bolton has argued for regime change in Iran and for America to take a proactive military role to make that happen. Bolton served as the US ambassador to the United Nations under George W. Bush and, later, as national security advisor to Donald Trump during his first term.
The partnership with Trump was fleeting, however. He did not leave the administration on good terms and has been a critic of Trump since. He’s even been indicted by Trump’s Department of Justice for the mishandling of classified documents. Despite that back story, it is still a bit confusing to hear one of America’s foremost Iran critics break with the Trump administration on this war. How did Trump lose the Republican party’s biggest Iran War Hawk? And why?
Today, Explained publishes video episodes every Saturday tackling key issues in politics and culture. Subscribe to Vox’s YouTube channel to get them. New episodes of Today, Explained drop every day of the week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite listening app.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Chapter titles:
00:00 Intro
01:43 Seeking regime change in Iran
06:01 Why Trump went to war in Iran now
7:00 The Iran war debate: Trump 1
7:59 Was Iranian retaliation a consideration?
10:00 Reasons for the Iran war now
12:38 Trump’s stock market concerns
16:38 Lessons from Trump’s first term
18:46 Is regime change in Iran even possible?
20:25 Trump’s self-declared success
22:26 Did Iran pose an imminent nuclear threat?
23:42 The role of public opinion in the Iran war
25:00 How to bring about regime change
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
Something is definitely happening in the AI world, but how seriously should we take it? Is this another hype cycle or a genuine inflection point?
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Sean Illing talks with journalist Kelsey Piper (formerly of Vox, now at The Argument) about what’s changed, why AI “agents” are a different beast than yesterday’s chatbots, and why the debate is stuck between two lazy positions: total panic or total shrug. They get into the incentives driving the labs, what “alignment” even means, and why the real fear isn’t Terminator-style robots, but powerful systems sliding into everything before we’re ready.
Host: Sean Illing (@SeanIlling)
Guest: Kelsey Piper (@KelseyTuoc)
2:39 Recent changes to AI
6:35 AI models and blackmail in a controlled setting
14:36 AI agents versus LLMs
19:33 Are we building machines that will surpass us?
23:30 Who’s responsible for regulating AI?
31:24 What are the most realistic utopian and dystopian scenarios?
We would love to hear from you. To tell us what you thought of this episode, email us at [email protected] or leave us a voicemail at 1-800-214-5749. Your comments and questions help us make a better show.
And you can watch new episodes of The Gray Area on YouTube. New episodes drop every Monday and Friday.
Listen to The Gray Area ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members.
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
For generations, we’ve been taught that if you want to move a relationship forward, you have to follow a specific set of steps: Meet someone, fall in love, and eventually, move in together. Because moving in is a signal that the relationship is serious.
But a growing number of couples are opting out of that last step. Mike and Susan have been together for 23 years, but they’ve never lived together…and they don’t plan to.
This arrangement has a name: “living apart together” (or LAT), and it’s more common than you might think. Between 2000 and 2019, the number of married couples living separately rose by more than 25 percent. And it’s particularly popular with couples later in life, generally people in their 50s or 60s who are retired.
So if sharing a home is the ultimate sign of love and commitment, why are some couples deciding not to do it at all? And is living together actually the best model for every relationship? Or is it just the one we’ve normalized?
Read more about Living Apart Together:
Vicki Larson’s book goes deeper into her personal story and includes more research on wider trends: LATitude: How You Can Make a Live Apart Together Relationship Work,
https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/LATitude/Vicki-Larson/9781627783323
Hear about the myths around living apart together: The Learn to Love Podcast, “Living Apart Together With Vicki Larson” https://open.spotify.com/episode/6yCEt5n2Jo4Je9iBT9qBzI
This New York Times article goes deeper into why this trend is particularly appealing to people later in life: Older singles have found a new way to partner up: Living apart, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/16/well/family/older-singles-living-apart-LAT.html
The private “Apartners” facebook group for LAT couples that Mike and Susan mention in the video: Apartners (Living Apart Together) | Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/groups/1593324210932967
A helpful article from AARP on how marriage is changing: Midlife marriage: Love it, leave it, or reinvent it, https://www.aarp.org/family-relationships/midlife-marriage-love-it-leave-it-or-reinvent-it/
A deeper dive published in Time on LAT relationships: How living apart together is changing long-term relationships, https://time.com/7261972/living-apart-together-relationships-essay/
This video is presented by T-Mobile: Broadband. T-Mobile: Broadband doesn't have a say in our editorial decisions, but they make videos like this one possible.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
We all heard the myth while growing up: Carrots are good for your eyesight. Or maybe even: Carrots can make you see in the dark. But where did this myth come from? And is there any basis in science?
It turns out that carrots are chock-full of vitamin A, which is necessary for vision. But most people today get enough vitamin A in their normal diet, and eating an excess of the orange vegetable won’t boost your eyesight or grant you night vision. In fact, consuming more vitamin A than your body can handle (via supplements instead of natural fruits and vegetables) can be detrimental to your health.
The origins of this common myth actually lie in World War II.
During the Blitz (the German Luftwaffe’s bombing campaign against London and other British cities), the British government had several important reasons to persuade both its citizens and the wider world that eating carrots improved eyesight. The Ministry of Information and Ministry of Food worked together to spread some shockingly impactful carrot-based propaganda. And the myth remains prevalent to this day.
Vox producer Nate Krieger spoke to an ophthalmologist and a World War II propaganda historian to get to the bottom of the carrot vision myth. This video explores the impetus behind this strangely targeted propaganda campaign, explains why it was so successful, and reintroduces the world to Dr. Carrot.
Read more about carrots’ strange role in World War II history:
Persuading the People by David Welch
Lord Woolton: Feeding Wartime Britain
https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/Lord-Woolton-Feeding-Wartime-Britain/
Carrots Can’t Help You See in the Dark. Here’s How a World War II Propaganda Campaign Popularized the Myth: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/carrots-cant-help-you-see-in-the-dark-heres-how-world-war-ii-propaganda-campaign-popularized-the-myth-28812484/
The World Carrot Museum: https://archive.ph/Md0R9
“Britain is Your Friend” by Rosemary Hill: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v38/n24/rosemary-hill/britain-is-your-friend
This video is presented by Stonyfield Organics. Stonyfield Organics doesn’t have a say in our editorial decisions, but they make videos like this one possible.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
Nancy Pelosi's record of impact is undeniable. Over more than three decades in Congress, she is frequently cited among the effective legislative operators of her generation. Pelosi held together the votes for the Affordable Care Act, twice ascended to the speaker's chair, and built a fundraising machine that reshaped how her party competes.
Last week, at the SXSW conference in Austin, Texas, Vox’s Astead Herndon spoke with Pelosi about that record. In front of a packed crowd of innovators at the Vox Media Podcast Stage, he asked Pelosi about key moments in her career, her unshakable faith in the American electorate, and the outlook for November's midterm elections.
Pelosi is preparing to leave Congress at the end of this term, and it comes at a time of profound uncertainty for the Democratic Party. Republicans control the White House. Her party's polling favorability has reached historic lows, and a once solid liberal majority seems to be fraying on lines of age, race, and class. There's no consensus about what went wrong or who should lead next. Regardless, Pelosi says she has absolute confidence that Democrats will take back the House this year.
Today, Explained publishes video episodes every Saturday tackling key issues in politics and culture. Subscribe to Vox’s YouTube channel to get them. New episodes of Today, Explained drop every day of the week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite listening app.
If you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists, sign up for our Patreon at patreon.com/vox. Each month, our members get access to exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Chapter titles:
00:00 Intro
1:52 What drove Rep. Pelosi into politics
5:10 Barriers in Rep. Pelosi’s path
10:10 What drives Pelosi’s optimism
14:12 What Dems need to do to win
18:02 Trump’s Save America Act
20:00 Views on Trump and the future

Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H